Talk:Comet Donati

Astronomy: Astronomical objects / Solar System Low‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Astronomical objects, which collaborates on articles related to astronomical objects.
	This article is supported by Solar System task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Photographed?[edit]

If it was photographed, then surely any copyright on that pic is long expired. Is the photo available anywhere? Mdotley 00:48, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I know this is seven years late, but - it is, in "The Earliest Comet Photographs: Usherwood, Bond, and Donati 1858" by Pasachoff, Olson and Hazen in the "Journal for the History of Astronomy" - a google will get you to the article.

The surviving picture (by Bond) is very poor, hence seldom reproduced, and was regarded as such at the time. I have never understood why he did not have another go - or why no-one has applied enhancing software to see if something can be extracted. There was a better picture by Usherwood, which impressed Bond, but that, tragically, has long been lost :( Jellyandjocko (talk) 17:33, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Next perihelion[edit]

What reference do you have that Comet Donati will come to perihelion in the specific year 3811? Have you accounted for perturbations in the orbit? A barycentric calculation of the orbital period (unperturbed and with the comet currently outside of the inner solar system) comes up with 6.35E+5 days (or 1739 years). Add that to the last perihelion date (1858) and you get a crude estimated return year of 3597. I must revert you edit as unreferenced. -- Kheider (talk) 01:16, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Even comet 177P/Barnard with a much shorter orbital period of 119 years has somewhat different solutions to the next perihelion date. -- Kheider (talk) 16:34, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Three tails?[edit]

It looks like there are two ion tails and one dust tail. Is that correct? If so, why are there two ion tails? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:8003:E414:3A01:BCF7:EA8C:97FC:DF9D (talk) 09:01, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]