Talk:Committees for the Defense of the Revolution
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Committees for the Defense of the Revolution article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit] This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): RobJim. Peer reviewers: RobJim.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 18:08, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Quote
[edit]Removed the quote, "Citizens must be careful of their actions and of what they say, as they are being constantly monitored." It adds nothing to the article that isn't expressed elsewhere. I also deleted the equally unnecessary content note that tries to discredit the speaker of the quote. Martiano 21:49, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Author cites terrorist anti-Castro organization.
[edit]The author cites information from an anti-Castro, terrorist organization known as the Cuban American National Foundation. This organization was responsible for the bombing of hotels in Havana in 1997. One former leader of the organization is Luis Posada Carriles, who was indicted for the 1976 bombing of a Cubana Airlines flight 455, killing all 73 passengers onboard. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ghostofgushall (talk • contribs) 02:54, 4 May 2007 (UTC).
Other countries
[edit]There should be a separate article on CDR in Burkina Faso. Also, I think the name has been use in some other countries as well. --Soman (talk) 07:49, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
Only Criticism?
[edit]This article mostly focuses on the criticisms of the CDRs and has very little about the history or origins of them, let alone the argument of proponents of the organizations which see them as community organizations, not tools of repression.
Perhaps this is a NPOV issue? — Preceding unsigned comment added by KurtFF8 (talk • contribs) 13:24, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
missing data; fake sense of "journalistic balance" a problem
[edit]Fantastic that the CDRs organize block parties, medical help and other fun stuff. But for at least some of these activities, non-participation is definitely not allowed, and if you do not participate, you can expect harrassment and even, in some cases, criminal penalties. So the "assistance" is not without some dangerous strings, on which you will not want to pull too hard. I don't see that there is really anything positive about these CDRs, at least in terms of human rights, thus, the attempt at "balance" in the presentation of their role would strike many readers as absurd and foolish, that is, it is fundamentally kowtowing to a dictatorial regime. It is as if Wikipedia, had it existed in 1936, had struggled to point out that the Nazi's Nuremberg laws were in fact doing a great job at allowing the Jews to have their own, special place within the Reich. The CDRs are equivalent to the government spying on its own citizens, and reducing the space of private life effectively to zero. The article should reflect that fact, rather than struggling to be "balanced." Theonemacduff (talk) 03:22, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Committees for the Defense of the Revolution. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130410190428/http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5gq3GU2QzFyRWT84_YNvI3mgOy7tg?docId=CNG.cd0ab416a2c7901c0abb23f392c5057d.ad1 to https://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5gq3GU2QzFyRWT84_YNvI3mgOy7tg?docId=CNG.cd0ab416a2c7901c0abb23f392c5057d.ad1
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051220203848/http://www.lacalle.cubaweb.cu/ to http://www.lacalle.cubaweb.cu/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:36, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
Additional Information
[edit]Hello everybody I added significant amounts of information to the page in the History, Functions and Activities sections. I look forward to your comments. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RobJim (talk • contribs) 18:24, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
Such nonsense should be deleted
[edit]Take a look at this sentence "Strong critics such as A. Rivera Caro, a journalist for El Nuevo Herald, trace Fidel Castro's CDR system's origin to the similarly named and directed "committees of territorial vigilance" established by Adolf Hitler in 1935." it should be deleted because of the following reasons: 1)That "journalist" works for a anti-Cuba newspaper accused of using government-paid journalists.(read their Wikipedia page "El Nuevo Herald")So it's not a reliable source. 2)The source is a YouTube video, which is not the best source to cite since it's a kind of self media. 3)Note that there was a "Worker's Party of Germany", does that mean every current Worker's Party can be "traced back" to that far-right ultranationalist party??? If no one opposes, then I'll delete that sentence. --A planetree leaf (talk) 11:05, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Looks like no one opposed, so I removed that sentence. Feel free to revert the edit if you give a reason. --A planetree leaf (talk) 05:33, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
Hand picked by Castro?
[edit]Under structure it says "Joining the committee is not selective; however, the top leadership of the organization is drawn from a select pool of loyalists at the discretion of Castro." which seems unlikely when Fidel (who it's probably reffering to as the source is from 1994) is dead. Is there any newer, more recent information about that that could replace this? KptStörtebeker (talk) 11:33, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Citation 11
[edit]This Citation (http://www.capitolhillcubans.com/2011/08/repressive-benefits-of-people-to-people.html) leads to a website that doesn't exist anymore 2600:1007:B02F:C5E7:C018:F560:B069:2242 (talk) 03:56, 23 December 2023 (UTC)