Talk:Complete glucose breakdown
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit] This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 27 January 2020 and 8 May 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): BabyBale.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:23, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit] This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 28 January 2019 and 15 May 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): EllesaNaito, GerenWijaya. Peer reviewers: GerenWijaya.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 18:13, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Untitled
[edit]There's much more to be added in this article. Also, this temporary definition is unclear. I shall work on it. --Enigma 00:00, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
Merger with Glycolysis
[edit]I think it would be a good idea to merge this page with Glycolysis. Because this page covers almost the same content, I think it would be a good idea to merge this page into Glycolysis. Any non-glycolysis-related data will be merged into TCA Cycle and Electron Transport Chain. Iwill not do the merge until someone comments for it.
Littleb2009 (talk) 00:44, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
Littleb2009 --- I see what you've done, and why you may have thought it a good idea: there's a lot of overlap. However, "Complete glucose breakdown" is NOT a synonym for glycolysis, but for glycolysis + Krebs cycle. The first bit is anaerobic and yields little energy; the second is aerobic, and yields a lot. So the redirect to glycolysis is wrong and misleading. I agree that the article, as it was, was pretty hopeless: it summarized glycolysis, followed by the briefest of mentions of the Krebs cycle, when the latter should have had at least equal weight. So I think we need a different redirect target, i.e. CGB = G + KC. We do in fact have an article on that topic, it's the surprisingly-titled Cellular respiration. I think I shall WP:BOLDly go and change the redirect now. Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:17, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Start a discussion about improving the Complete glucose breakdown page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Complete glucose breakdown" page.