Talk:Concrete Jungle (supplement)
Appearance
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Marvel RPG supplements
[edit]Is it necessary for all Marvel RPG supplements to have a separate article for each of them? I do not believe that each entry on List of Marvel RPG supplements is notable enough to warrant a separate article. The information in these stub articles should instead be merged into the list. Thoughts? Fortdj33 (talk) 16:40, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
- I concur. Argento Surfer (talk) 17:26, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
- Several of them have multiple independent reviews noted on them, so I think at least those should be retained. I have verified per RPGNet and RPGGeek that these reviews are valid. 65.126.152.254 (talk) 13:22, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
- How about making two lists? One list being a table (like it is now with basic info) and one extended list with separate chapters that detail every campaign/supplemental. Either both lists in two different articles or even both in one article, maybe only giving very prominent supplementals then its own article (like for example the Gamer's Handbook). -- Weapon X (talk, contribs)
00:52, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Categories:
- Redirect-Class role-playing game articles
- Low-importance role-playing game articles
- WikiProject Role-playing games articles
- Redirect-Class Comics articles
- Bottom-importance Comics articles
- Redirect-Class Comics articles of Bottom-importance
- Redirect-Class Marvel Comics articles
- Marvel Comics work group articles
- WikiProject Comics articles