This article should be maintained as "congenital fourth nerve palsy" rather than "fourth nerve palsy" because it is a unique entity in presentation and history. What applies to congenital fourth nerve palsy does not necessarily generalize to all cases of fourth nerve palsy (e.g., acquired).
ok...but that being said there is very little on the fourth nerve palsy page. because of this perhaps these two articles should be combined for now with the specifics to congenital or acquired types addressed? (to later separate if enough differentiating information?). i will at least make sure the pages are linked now...--Xris0 (talk) 15:29, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
