Jump to content

Talk:Coniston railway station, New South Wales

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

No consensus to move. Vegaswikian (talk) 19:56, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Coniston railway station, New South WalesConiston railway station — The Australian train station would appear to be a better choice for the WP:PRIMARY topic. The Australian station is still open for regular passenger traffic while the British station has been closed since 1962 and has been "left to decay". Mattinbgn (talk) 10:06, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I find it difficult to decide which should be the primary article. People in UK will naturally think of Coniston, Cumbria, a well known spot in the Lake District, even though its station is now closed. I would be happiest with "Coniston Railway Station" as a disambig page containing both station with their counties/territories. --Peter I. Vardy (talk) 14:29, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

3 Platforms?

[edit]

Why does are there references to 3 platforms both in the sidebar and the platform listing? There are only two platforms at this station. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RabidRabbit93111 (talkcontribs) 05:34, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Coniston railway station, New South Wales. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:54, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]