Talk:Constitution Plaza
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Tihs plaza seems to lack notability enough to stand on its own. It's not an historic district, registered landmark, etc. It look like the contents of this article would make a great addition to the Hartford article. Rklawton 00:13, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
- Quite frankly, I think that the Hartford, Connecticut article is getting too long and unwieldy and should actually be split up rather than added to. --Elipongo 05:22, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
- Holy cow, you're right, the Hartford, Connecticut article IS long. Still, I vote "YES" to the merge. I think all the little pieces should be merged before splitting off a (neighborhood) or (landmark) section off from the BIG article. --Emana 00:54, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
Leave as separate entry...has been greatly expanded.[edit]
I have added significantly to the post, with well researched material. There are links to expanded notes on the Civic Center and the city itself.
It should stand alone as an entry. It is still considered a local landmark and is a big part of modern day Hartford history. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.164.149.242 (talk) 05:33, 4 January 2007 (UTC).
- O-kay, this is a lot of stuff. And it needs to be WP:MOSed. Will remove merge tag. -- Emana 01:04, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Constitution Plaza. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060618160952/http://hartford.omaxfield.com/constitution.html to http://hartford.omaxfield.com/constitution.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:40, 12 August 2017 (UTC)