Jump to content

Talk:Constitutional references to God

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Scope of article

[edit]

Is this article intended to address only invocation of God in the preamble to constitutions? If so, the name needs to be changed. If not, the introduction does. jnestorius(talk) 00:42, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're right. I don't know whether there are constitutions with references to God in the text only, but to make sure, I've changed the lead sentence to: "Several national constitutions make reference to God, most often in the preamble."  Sandstein  05:50, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rwanda and Latin America

[edit]

Rwanda no longer uses the 1991 constitution. If anyone has a link to its current constitution, shouldn't we replace the text of the 1991 constitution with that of the current one?

Also, a good deal of Latin American countries mention God in the preambles of their constitutions; unfortunately, many of these are not available online in English. Most if not all of them can be found here, in Spanish. If someone here is fluent in Spanish, could they add these countries to the table in the article? Josh (talk) 01:47, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't wish to stray too far into the alluring but forbidden pastures of original research, but I've added Pakistan, copying from the Constitution of Pakistan article, which I believe is unique among constitutional preambles in denying sovereignty of the proclaimants.

MbpX (talk) 08:11, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Broken logic of the phrase

[edit]

this edit has two issues: (a) broken logic of the overall complex clause (2) the change looks plausible, but unreferenced and hence need verification. Staszek Lem (talk) 02:32, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Constitutional references to God. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:10, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Constitutional references to God. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:13, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]