Talk:Contax N Digital

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Photography

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Photography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of photography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhotographyWikipedia:WikiProject PhotographyTemplate:WikiProject PhotographyPhotography articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Samples

It's a fascinating camera - does anyone have any sample images? As I understand it, very few were sold, and only a few reviews appeared, none with the kind of thoroughness of e.g. Digital Photography Review, so most claims for its image quality are subjective. The few unadorned samples I have seen (e.g. here and here) were pleasant but didn't stand out greatly. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 09:19, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I use N digital.

You can see pictures I took here — Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.192.188.24 (talk) 19:04, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cool! Assuming you haven't run the photos through one of Photoshop's filters, it look as if the camera had a noise problem (e.g. the hair in this shot seems to have been smoothed together by noise reduction, which was a feature of the Kodak 14n as well). I wonder why the early full-frame cameras were like that? Was the sensor so expensive that the rest of the electronics had to be sourced on the cheap, was it down to poor sensor design, or an inherent problem with larger sensors, or something else? -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 17:30, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Contax N Digital. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080703153328/http://www.contaxcameras.co.uk/slr/slr.asp to http://www.contaxcameras.co.uk/slr/slr.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:41, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]