Talk:Contemporary (disambiguation)

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles

Classical music

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this disambiguation page or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles

Notes

The word, Contemporary, as a noun, is not defined here. Simply the adjectival meanings.67.42.164.25 (talk) 18:21, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Signature of the Atomic Bomb

There are good reasons to claim that the catastrophical event of the atomic bombing of Japan, marks the shift to what we here term contemporary in regard of art as defined in the contents page per 27 October 2010, or 19 Dhu al-Qidah 1431, or 19 Heshavan 5771. Butoh may thus be regarded as the epitome of contemporary art. Except from this, it is a problematic definition for a number of reasons. First. Art by artists working both before the World War II, during and after, can not necessarily be defined as more, or less, contemporary because of this timestamp. Contemporary art did explicitly exist also before World War II, as this label - contemporary - has been expressed as a mark of quality, pertaining especially to modernism, by art carrying an ideal summoning, from the artist or his genius, making some kind of composed expression of what, in such case, are to be evaluated or considered the spirit of the time, reflecting or in dialogue with the contemporary world, in the event of the art-making process including its publication or presentation. Another trickster is, for me, that the concept of contemporaneousness also must be regarded in relation to art that specifically deals with contemporarity as it moved through time. It is absurd as a Norwegian to not consider Henrik Ibsen a maker of contemporary art. His plays are distinguished by being contemporary plays and historic plays. I sincerly believe that Henrik Ibsen was intending to make drama that also were to be transformed, or may I say be transported by the unfolding of time. The retrospective style of his contemporary plays is at least a strong indication for that his plays not necessarily should stay in the conformity of the 19th century. I think it is possible to find many other reasons for striking out such a definition of contemporary art as this lexicalisation implies. --Xact (talk) 23:18, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disambig

Contemporary primarily means in the present time. Contemporary can also mean coexistent (in the past) or modern as an alternative meaning.

This page should redirect to contemporary history. With the secondary concepts, which include contemporary philosophy, placed on Contemporary (disambiguation). --J. D. Redding 14:20, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've got no issue with that (moving this page to Contemporary (disambiguation) and then redirecting the base name to Contemporary history, and adding a {{Redirect}} hatnote there. -- JHunterJ (talk) 14:35, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

~~Why did you revert this? you seem to been ok with the redirect. ... ??? --J. D. Redding 14:59, 14 June 2011 (UTC)~~ Never mind.--J. D. Redding 15:01, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Because cut-and-paste moves lose edit history. -- JHunterJ (talk) 15:03, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

yeah, I understand, that is why i said nevermind, and struck the question. Thanks. --J. D. Redding 15:08, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]