Jump to content

Talk:Controversies surrounding Silvio Berlusconi

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I don’t quite see how this fits into an article on the controversies surrounding Berlusconi. (Well, not until a dental hygienist became involved….) Should it be returned to the main article? Ian Spackman (talk) 22:23, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You're entirely right, Berlusconi didn't orchestrate the affair to gain public favour, which I'm sure he did, but that's irrelevant, therefore this is not a controversy in the context of the article. —James (TalkContribs) • 6:27pm 08:27, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

One-sided

[edit]

This article is titled "controversies" but shows only one side of each story (namely, the one accusing Berlusconi). Where are the controversies? --95.89.26.236 (talk) 02:03, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I mean, a contorversial fact is usually maintained/justified/supported by some and denied/criticized/disputed by others. Here, however, I can only see one point of view, and no signs of controversy. To describe a controversy, one should try to convey two contrasting positions...--95.89.26.236 (talk) 14:32, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, one last thought: I think a more suitable title for this article would be "Criticism of Silvio Berlusconi" or "Scandals surrounding Silvio Berlusconi". Otherwise, the article should be changed and rewritten to portray an actual controversy, and not just to list criticism, gossip-worthy incidents and scandals. In fact, why is this a separate page at all? I think it should return to the main article and appear, in a shortened form, under "Criticism".--95.89.26.236 (talk) 14:38, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 9 external links on Controversies surrounding Silvio Berlusconi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:05, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Controversies surrounding Silvio Berlusconi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:10, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Controversies surrounding Silvio Berlusconi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:58, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Controversies surrounding Silvio Berlusconi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:40, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Erika Geroni

[edit]

PISALA SRM VAM VEČ KRAT SAMO MI BRIŠEJO VSE ZE 3 LETA.LP ERIKA GERONI 0940732005 2A00:EE2:805:BF00:AF37:D590:477B:387E (talk) 13:50, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]