Talk:Controversy over the discovery of Haumea/GA4

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 16:07, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

I'll review this article within the next few days. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 16:07, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

The article is certainly much better in terms of neutrality than it was. Anyway, here are the issues I found:

• I'm skeptical of using Mike Brown as a source for some of this, seeing as how he was a major party in the dispute. Namely, ref #2 and possibly ref #4 I'd prefer to see a different source used. 17, 21, and 29 are fine because of when/why they're used.
  • Ref #4 is only referencing an exact date and "within an hour" now. Nergaal (talk) 05:38, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
  • I have minimized the use of #2. How is it now? Nergaal (talk) 06:09, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

That's the only issue I have, so I'll put the article on hold. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 04:12, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

• • • It looks better now, so as a result I'll pass the article as a GA. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 04:06, 23 November 2010 (UTC)