Jump to content

Talk:Convair F2Y Sea Dart/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · contribs) 11:05, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Will get to this shortly. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 11:05, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Lead and infobox;
    • was a unique American seaplane fighter aircraft; What is the purpose of "unique"?
      •  Fixed
    • The second para needs to be broken to sentences. Except the last sentence the entire para is presented as a single sentence using commas which in the end gives rise to difficulty in getting the flow and the meaning. Break this.
    •  Done
    • It was created "in 1950s" as a result of "to overcome" the problems with supersonic planes taking off and landing on aircraft carriers that was experienced in the 1950s
    •  Done
  • Section 1;
    • Link U.S. Navy on the first mention; not on the second
    •  Done
  • Section 2;
    • "Required" power was to be "put up" by a pair of after-burning Westinghouse XJ46-WE-02 turbojets
    •  Done
  • Section 3;
    • Who is E. D. "Sam" Shannon? Mention his position, if possible
    • but they could not cure the sluggish performance -> but they were unable to resolve the sluggish performance
    •  Done
    • a demonstration for Navy officials -> a demonstration to the naval officials
    •  Done
    • disintegrated in midair; delink the external link. External links are not allowed in the body of the article per WP:EL
    •  Done
    • Link Second World War
    •  Done
    • breakup of the airframe -> airframe breakage
    •  Done
    • Link airframe
    •  Done
    • He is buried -> He was buried
    •  Done
Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 03:55, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 06:05, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]