Talk:Convention of Lhasa

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tibet Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tibet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Tibet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TibetWikipedia:WikiProject TibetTemplate:WikiProject TibetTibet articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Reference problem

There are two references to work(s) by Charles Allen, but the work or works are not stated. DuncanHill (talk) 11:58, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Same problem with the references to "Bell" and "Powers". DuncanHill (talk) 11:59, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 26 June 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. Current name is used in reliable sources, and users do not see the possibility of confusion. CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 19:26, 2 July 2022 (UTC)(non-admin closure)[reply]

Convention of Lhasa → Convention Between Great Britain and Tibet – As per WP:CommonName & to prevent confusion with other treaties using the same name (Lhasa Convention or Lhasa Treaty. The proposed name is also the official name, although this is not the reason for the move request Dominique Roux (talk) 16:03, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Polyamorph (talk) 12:37, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments below copied from WP:RM/TR Polyamorph (talk)

Question: Lhasa Convention and Lhasa Treaty are both redirects to this page. So where is the confusion? Polyamorph (talk) 16:22, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dominique Roux This article was also moved back in 2021 (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Convention_of_Lhasa&oldid=1020573395), so might not be uncontroversial. -Kj cheetham (talk) 16:35, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - Wikipedia articles are named after WP:COMMONNAMES used in reliable sources. Official names are not used. If there is need for disambiguation, then they are disambiguated using the year of the treaty. (I have now added multiple ciations to WP:RS.) -- Kautilya3 (talk) 08:22, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. No need for any move. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:47, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.