Jump to content

Talk:Convoy SC 143

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Deletion proposal

[edit]

Yes I object to this proposal; this article is as notable as any in the categories in which it's been placed, and the subject is well documented in the references given. I cannot see any reason for labelling it as such. Xyl 54 (talk) 16:26, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep From Wiktionary:

encyclopedic, adjective
2. as with an encyclopedia, having a comprehensive scope, especially of information or knowledge

Removing a promising article on one convoy from the totality of the Atlantic War would leave a significant hole behind. This may not be a famous convoy, but it has every right to belong in an encyclopedia claiming any sort of validly comprehensive scope. I cannot even understand the admin's decision to prod this article. Andy Dingley (talk) 16:54, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

? Then why don't you remove the prod tag? --Orange Mike | Talk 16:59, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I've gone ahead and removed the prod. Much article expansion has taken place including the listing of multiple print references. I believe that the case for deletion now is at least unclear. Regards.--Cube lurker (talk) 17:05, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
For the record I must have edit-conflicted on the removal but I support the removal. (Although I would have used a different edit summary).--Cube lurker (talk) 17:13, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Move

[edit]

I've moved this page to a British English format, as per Tag below. Xyl 54 (talk) 14:33, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I’ve moved this now to the format suggested at the MilHist discussion on naming convoys. Xyl 54 (talk) 11:45, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]



This article is written in British English on the basis of strong national ties to the topic.
And it is the variety chosen by the first major contributor to the article.