Talk:Copra plantations in New Guinea

Melanesia: Papua New Guinea Low‑importance

	Oceania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Melanesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Melanesia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MelanesiaWikipedia:WikiProject MelanesiaTemplate:WikiProject MelanesiaMelanesia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Papua New Guinea (assessed as Low-importance).

Australia C‑class Low‑importance

	Australia portal Copra plantations in New Guinea is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

NPOV

According to the source A prodigy of wastefulness, corruption, ignorance and indolence: the Expropriation Board in New Guinea 1920-1927 as used in the article says; This was disputed in the Australian parliament where a member cited `five returned soldiers who are men of the best type...

To say in the lead described as the "dummying evil" by the Australian government of the time is POV, when the articles other source clearly say otherwise. Gnan garra 09:40, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gnangarra. I'll have a citation for the disputed text within 48 hours. Talk soon, Lester 13:16, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just had another look at it. It was the Australian Government's Auditor General who made that quote about the "dummying evil", but to make it clearer I added the words "Auditor-General" to the text. The existing reference is from The Age, though the Fiji business magazine (used to reference other text) also carries that information. I don't believe it was a criticism of the soldiers themselves, who were considered good character. I think it was more of a criticism of companies like Carpenter & Co who made most of the money instead of it all going to the Australian soldiers, and probably a criticism of the policies and processes of the time that allowed it all to happen. Best wishes, Lester 15:09, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is this tag still justified? The lead has changed. I will detag accordingly --Matilda ^talk 21:12, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

References

The major problem with this article is it relies on one source (reference one and two are in fact the same article but labeled differently for whatever reason) with periodic smatterings from a second. More sources, drawn from wider viewpoints, are desperately needed to make this less POV. At the moment the POV is very blatant. Sarah 11:27, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

To help lessen this blatant POV I am going to be WP:BOLD and morph the article into something more encyclopedic. Prester John (talk) 03:50, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fundamentals...

The article is a tad vague on whether it is talking about the island of New Guinea, or the eastern part of the island that is now the country of Papua New Guinea. I suspect most, if not all, relates to eastern New Guinea (now PNG) --Merbabu (talk) 10:21, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed it. I think. --Merbabu (talk) 13:19, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lucas and Burns Philp

There is almost certainly more to be written on the connection of Lucas as chair and his relationship with Burns Philp. Particularly the timing of his resignation as Chair and the commencement of the dummying activities. --Matilda ^talk 22:23, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Copra plantations in New Guinea. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110714191911/http://nomoa.com/articles/PNGnius/2004-04-07%2003%3A34 to http://nomoa.com/articles/PNGnius/2004-04-07%2003%3A34

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:28, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tertiary stage

Description of tertiary and how it helps in copra production 103.14.90.131 (talk) 10:48, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]