Talk:Corey Smith (artist)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Copyvio[edit]

The Art section is copied in its entirety, from his biography (by Mathew Korfhage). I've therefore removed it, as there is no evidence that permission has been received to use it. Sionk (talk) 19:32, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

How can I site permission for Matthew Korfhage? Alice0000 (talk) 19:37, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:COPYREQ. The easiest thing to do would be to describe Smith's art in your own words (and citing reliable independent sources for the information). Sionk (talk) 22:42, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

this was already done. Also Matthew Korfhage gives his permission to use the biography he wrote for Corey Smith (artist)...how do I add this Alice0000 (talk) 01:57, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

How can I correct this? WP:IOWN please advise - thank you Alice0000 (talk) 03:53, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Alice, the above people are wrong, I'm fairly certain. You don't need permission for this. A simple list of a person's artwork does not rise to the standard of copyrightable material. I have removed the copyright violation notice, though I will follow up on this, and re-add it if necessary Qwyrxian (talk) 08:12, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The copy-pasted material was nothing to do with a list of art or exhibitions. It was the art-speak description of Smith's art, which I removed. I agree the massive 'copyvio' notice was a bit unnecessary, considering the copy-pasted material had already been removed by myself and the other editor. Sionk (talk) 14:28, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
All that being said, I've just scrolled to the right of http://coreysmithtimetravel.com/about.html and noticed the list of exhibitions. The content and presentation format of list or statistical information is normally copyrighted too. The author here has done nothing to re-write or summarise the information in their own words so, in my view, it would be fair to removed that information too (unless it is presented in a substantially different way). Sionk (talk) 14:34, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Now that the primary copyvio issue seems to be resolved (thank you to everyone who participated in what appears to have been a convoluted edit path), there remains the question of the exhibition lists. As the list on the source website appears to be inclusive and not selected creatively or using any proprietary methods, it seems likely that the reuse of that information here is either fair use or common usage. I note that this differs from creatively selected lists (Best Monster Movies ever, or the like) and from proprietary lists (Top 100 hits of the 70s, etc). Those types of lists cannot be reused. We will, of course, want to source anything likely to be disputed in the lists (and the above WP:SPS is not a reliable source). The copyvio template and process are a bit cumbersome, but I understand the need for the process. --Tgeairn (talk) 17:20, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Corey Smith.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Corey Smith.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files missing permission as of 22 February 2012

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Corey Smith.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 09:20, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a more appropriate name?[edit]

Is there a more aptly descriptive name than Corey Smith (artist)? There seems to be some confusion about his notability as an artist (hey, Van Gogh's paintings were not worth much until well after his death, & the Brandenberg concerto manuscript once sold for about $22). However, he is quite well known as a snowboard designer, & before that as a snowboarder. I do not know if he competed, but he clearly is in the snowboarder press.

However, renaming the article Corey Smith (snowboard designer, artist, and snowboarder) seems a bit awkward. Does anyone have any suggestions? Peaceray (talk) 07:57, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There really is no other descriptor for Corey Smith (artist) because he is also considered an artist by the snowboard community with his handmade snowboards being acquired by the Utah Snowboard Museum. http://springbreaksnowboards.com/spring-break-boards-in-the-slc-snowboard-museum/

(Alice0000 (talk) 23:18, 2 June 2013 (UTC))[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Corey Smith (artist). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:02, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]