Talk:Corieltauvi

Requested move

Inscription evidence discovered about twenty years ago (as mentioned in the article), suggests the correct form of this tribal name is Corieltauvi (currently a redirect). This is now generally accepted and Coritani is only used in older works. The key articles on the subject are Tomlin's 'Roman Leicester, a Corrigendum: For Coritani should we read Corieltauvi?' in Transactions of the Leicester Archaeological & Historical Society 48 and 'Non Coritani sed Corieltauvi' in the Antiquaries' Journal 63 (both 1983) Walgamanus 22:26, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Rather to my surprise, this does seem to be correct. The new discoveries, however, should be the first paragraph of the article. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 22:34, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Page moved, cheers. -GTBacchus^(talk) 21:53, 9 February 2007 (UTC)