Talk:Corium (nuclear reactor)

Addition request

This article should be translated to Japanese, as soon as possible. Someone in atomic physics/engineering, please do! Tsukubarian (talk) 02:50, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

seriously?

This article should be moved to LFCM or fuel containing mixture (nuclear meltdown) or something similar, as soon as possible. It seems a little inappropriate to keep a totally meaningless vanity name for nuclear reactor waste material, now that there are very different types of failed reactor in use. Continuing to use the vanity name 'corium' when referring to either Chernobyl or the current situation is only going to create an additional layer of obfuscation, and that is the last thing anyone needs at this point. The above request illustrates EXACTLY why use of the term 'corium' should be heavily discouraged. Zaphraud (talk) 01:17, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Two years on and the world hasn't lost a wink of sleep over this issue. 87.114.215.111 (talk) 17:55, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fukushima

Is there a reason why there no mention of Fukushima? Redhanker (talk) 23:22, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Presumably, Fukushima I ("Fukushima Dai-ichi") has not been added yet. It should be, at the earliest opportunity, as many of the Fukushima observed events strikingly illustrate the process of corium in meltdown, which TEPCO now admits to have occurred in Reactors 1, 2, and 3. Any volunteers? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.167.61.187 (talk • contribs) 17:45, May 30, 2011

the paragraph on it is scrambled - the sentence with temperatures in doesn't make sense at all. Midgley (talk) 16:21, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Photo

One of the final paragraphs begins with "it is possible to see in the photo shown below that the corium (molten core) will cool and change to a solid with time. (a) there is no photo below (b) even if there was, how could a photo show this? 87.114.215.111 (talk) 17:55, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You can see photos of the Chernobyl "Elephant's Foot" at this interesting article: Chernobyl’s Hot Mess, “the Elephant’s Foot,” Is Still Lethal -- œ^™ 04:51, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Corium (nuclear reactor). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 13:18, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Corium (nuclear reactor). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:49, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Corium (nuclear reactor). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:39, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

SL-1 incident

The 1961 SL-1 reactor incident is a good early disaster that is well documented but better video of the 90 minutes of film is needed to tell the story. My IQ >> 160 (talk) 21:04, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

etymology/origin?

It might be good to have something about the origin/etymology of the word and if there are examples of corium predating the Three Mile Island accident. The Wiktionary definition [[1]] says it was coined in 1974, but I don't see any cites. Rmd1023 (talk) 13:52, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Request: Add lifespan and cleanup of Corium

As a reader, I would like to know not only how corium is created, but also how it is solved/resolved. Where have they cleaned up corium, how effectively, and how often do they? I just imagine a timeline of corium from creation -> heat loss -> eventual end of radioactive isotopes half lives or through human intervention. Xecten (talk) 21:55, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]