Talk:Corona, California

California: Inland Empire / Southern California High‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Inland Empire task force (assessed as Top-importance).
	This article is supported by Southern California task force (assessed as High-importance).

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Untitled

What about a mention of the Fender Center for Music Education in the main article?

I think someone ought to add a history section to the city- something more than just a mere "citrus town" to a sub-urb.

Fair use rationale for Image:CoronaCaliforniaSeal.png

Image:CoronaCaliforniaSeal.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:36, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Economy section: "most important" businesses

Kind of a loaded introduction? "But my business is important, too! Here, I'll add it, because it's important." What does this encyclopedia consider important features of a city? Probably a couple of the listed businesses do not qualify. Michael Patrick (talk) 20:23, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Lots of of unnecessary listing in this "Economy" and "Notable" setions. I will try to pare these down if there are no oljbections.Wkharrisjr (talk) 16:27, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I cleaned up the "Economy" and "Notable" sections.Wkharrisjr (talk) 18:35, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

About a few edits

In recent years, Corona has become an elite working-class bedroom community. I found the confusing entry in the article's view history record on removed edits, because elite and working-class are two different class statuses. The anon editor meant the top choice to live in for middle class residents and office professional commuters alike. Another edit stated until the 1980s, Corona was a predominantly Hispanic and white city is equally confusing, since Hispanic isn't really a race and I can guess Hispanics nearly composed half the city's population in the time before demographic changes took place in the coming decades until the 2010 census found a mixed Anglo/Latino city. There was a high increase of Blacks and Asian ethnic groups in Corona among the suburban communities in Riverside county. Mike D 26 (talk) 21:25, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Near Corona is the Butterfield Stage Flood Basin, which was developed from the early 1940s to make way for a future reservoir was finally set in the 1960s by the demolition of two residential communities of Butterfield and El Prado del Rincon, both were heavily Hispanic settled by Mexican immigrants and Mexican-Americans, some were in the region before the US annexed California in 1848. The removal of the less than 1,000 residents by Flood Control authorities was a travesty and the Dam was build in 1961 (which has the America Bicentennial (1976) celebration mural visible from Freeway routes 91 and 71) seems to send a message on ignorance of people forced from their homes in part caused by racism against Latinos in the USA. In fact, the discrepancy and errors of census records of how many locals claim "Spanish/Californio/Chicano/Mexican/Hispanic/Latino/even Portugese" descent may be large, yet are various as not all Latinos are monolithic and may feel more "American" or go by their respective nationality, including some whom are Spanish American, Basque American, and Portugese American when one thinks of Latin America and Latin peoples (i.e. Portugal). 71.102.21.238 (talk) 12:39, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Corona, California. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100602013611/https://www.oglethorpe.edu/about%5Fus/crypt%5Fof%5Fcivilization/most_wanted_time_capsules.asp to http://www.oglethorpe.edu/about_us/crypt_of_civilization/most_wanted_time_capsules.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:25, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Corona, California. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:41, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]