Talk:Corona Australis/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: TheSpecialUser (talk · contribs) 04:16, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Will finish by today eve. Thanks! — TheSpecialUser ^(TSU) 04:16, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article is well written and sourced properly. Just few things before GA:

It is a blue-white main sequence star located 130 light years away, - no need of ,

a pair of yellowish white stars 58 light years away which orbit each other every 122 years - need a , after stars

It varies by a quarter of a magnitude around an average apparent magnitude of 4.83 every seven hours. It lies 98 light years away - can you merge?

Lying 202 light years away, Lambda Coronae Australis is a double splittable in small telescopes, the blue white primary has a magnitude of 5.1 with a 9.7 magnitude companion. - little odd and tough to understand. Can you please make a separate sentence about the blue white primary has a magnitude of 5.1 with a 9.7 magnitude companion or clarify the existing one

Corona Australis also harbours RX J1856.5-3754, an isolated neutron star that is one of the closest to the earth at approximately 200 light years and suspected to be a strange star. - ref?

~~opened up a can of worms with this one - just reading and digesting. I think I'll have to rejig it a bit...~~ rejigged. Casliber (talk · contribs) 18:16, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The 3rd century BC Aratus wrote of, but did not name, the constellation, -> In the 3rd century BC, Aratus, a Greek didactic poet wrote of but did not name the constellation,

am trying but google translate is not liking it. Will look tomorrow.. Casliber (talk · contribs) 18:34, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

within the Black Tortoise of the North (北方玄武, Běi Fāng Xuán Wǔ) - a simple thing needed and that is .

A later name was Al Iklīl al Janūbiyyah, which the European authors Chilmead -> It was later named as Al Iklīl al Janūbiyyah, which the European authors Chilmead.

tricky. I reworded but kept "name" as a noun as that is the subject of Chilmead etc. Casliber (talk · contribs) 18:20, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is it for now. I'll have another look at the article once this issues are solved. Cheers! — TheSpecialUser ^(TSU) 06:52, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]