Jump to content

Talk:Coronavirus

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

coronaviruses should be family coronaviridae, not orthocoronavirinae

[edit]

I quote the following source:

"Biologists classify organisms hierarchically on the basis of how they are related to one another. The term "orthocoronavirinae" represents a "sub-family" of the coronaviruses and simply denotes things that are rather closely related, explains Professor Mark Pagel, an evolutionary biologist and head of the Evolution Laboratory at the University of Reading, "In turn, these form part of a larger 'order of viruses' known as the nidovirales and Covid-19 is in this sub-family," Professor Pagel explains."

source: [1]https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/orthocoronavirinae-meaning-coronavirus-subfamily-sars-mers-symptoms-a9568931.html 136.143.216.95 (talk) 23:59, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why does coronavirus only refer to the subfamily coronavinae?

[edit]

Typically, families are the units which are referred to colloquially. For example, bears are ursidae, dogs are canidae, cats are felidae, assassin bugs are reduviidae, robber flies are asilidae, great apes are hominidae. IMO the article is incorrect to state coronaviruses are subfamily coronavirinae. IMO coronavirus should refer to the family coronaviridae.

136.143.209.157 (talk) 23:42, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]