Talk:Cosmodicy
Appearance
![]() | This is the talk page of a redirect that has been merged and now targets the page: • Theodicy Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at: • Talk:Theodicy Merged page edit history is maintained in order to preserve attributions. |
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Merge proposal
[edit]This entire article is only two paragraphs and an extended quotation - the Theodicy article is not so long that the content couldn't fit there. ESPECIALLY since the quotation does not use "cosmodicy" in the way defined in this article. In fact, it would appear that the identification with Nietzsche is using the same definition as Ashley, neither of which is anything like an "attempt to justify the fundamental goodness of the universe. eldamorie (talk) 17:20, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
Categories:
- Redirect-Class Philosophy articles
- NA-importance Philosophy articles
- Redirect-Class metaphysics articles
- NA-importance metaphysics articles
- Metaphysics task force articles
- Redirect-Class ethics articles
- NA-importance ethics articles
- Ethics task force articles
- Redirect-Class philosophy of religion articles
- NA-importance philosophy of religion articles
- Philosophy of religion task force articles