Talk:Craven

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 2 December 2021[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: mover per request. Favonian (talk) 19:15, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


– No clear primary topic per views[[1]], target is per WP:UKDISTRICTS and GeoNames. Google results are mixed between the district and dictionary meaning. Craven County, North Carolina gets 737 views and has a higher population (102,139) than the district (57,142) and although US counties include "County" in the name it is shown on GeoNames search as just "Craven". Craven A gets more views (1,393) but again may not just be "Craven" commonly. There is Craven in the Domesday Book which apparently covered a larger area and the current district don't seem like that much of a broad-concept article anyway and there is also Craven (Bradford ward) in West Yorkshire. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:15, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support In addition to the pageview data, the clickstream stats also point to there being no ptopic. Last month 92 readers navigated from Craven to Craven (disambiguation) - it's tied for being the most common outgoing pageview. Assuming almost all of those "lost" readers arrived at the page via search (rather than clicking a link in another article), we're looking at a little more than 25% of "Craven" searchers being taken to the wrong page (92/(1300*.26)). Which is pretty bad. Compare that to another borderline ptopic, Madonna, where the disambiguation page isn't even in the top 20 most frequent outgoing clicks. Colin M (talk) 23:02, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 02:18, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per all of the above - no primary topic even if you completely discount the dictionary definition. User:力 (powera, π, ν) 19:13, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.