Jump to content

Talk:Crime in India

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 9 January 2020 and 18 April 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Joker12346. Peer reviewers: Bola0657, Oleena.H, Stephaniegrisolia, Emilyfontana, Eharps15, AndrewYue123.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 18:39, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am creating a sandbox /Crime against foreigners. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Otolemur crassicaudatus (talkcontribs) 02:16, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Biased Article

[edit]

Population in India in 1950 was 350 million. Now it is 1100 million. According to the numbers in the article 600,000 in 1953 and 1,878,000 in 2006. That means the crime increase is trivial but by presenting it only in absolute numbers it is made to seem that the crime in India has increased by a lot. But if you refer http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_in_the_United_States That article is biased in favor of USA. How typical. There the numbers are reported per 100,000 population. Either both articles should present absolute numbers or both should present per 100,000 numbers or both. Having one article show absolute numbers while the other showing per 100,000 numbers shows the serious bias that Wikipedia has in favor of USA and against India. 122.164.93.94 (talk) 06:19, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comparison of Crime in India with USA: http://www.nationmaster.com/compare/India/United-States/Crime I am not saying India is better than USA. It has a lot of other problems that USA has not got. But when it comes to Crime India has lower rates when presented objectively. 122.164.93.94 (talk) 07:05, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]


This doesn't even suggest, let alone prove, an anti-Indian or pro-American bias, merely that whoever put those numbers in this articles didn't do a good job. So I'm going to do the math myself and add per-capita crime rates. LegalNerd87 (talk) 16:32, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I've edited the text and the table to reflect per-capita rates, using the exist crime figures, a 1953 population of 375,000,000 and a 2006 population of 1,157,390,000. LegalNerd87 (talk) 16:52, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Use of plural - Crimes

[edit]

The name of article should be pluralised.--Ali aff (talk) 11:34, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not needed. This article covers the general topic of "Crime in X country" (See Crime in Nepal, Crime in America etc); plural is only required if this was describing each individual crime (say List of crimes involving radioactive substances or something). -Ugog Nizdast (talk) 14:40, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image Remove

[edit]

2012 Crime Rate against Women per 100000 in India by its States and Union Territories, VAW Map Image show wrong information (uttar pradesh 3rd highest no. in crimes against women).Data Source: Crime in India 2012 Statistics, National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB), Ministry of Home Affairs, Govt of India, Table 5.1, page 385. --Bongan (talk) 10:09, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Crime in India. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:25, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Crime in India. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:12, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Crime in India. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:26, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]