Talk:Criminal (Ra.One song)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Σ (talk · contribs) 06:46, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
Doing... →Στc. 06:46, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
My immediate comment is that the article's length is a little short. There is no specific length requirement for GA, but the article must be broad in its coverage.
- Lead
- Looks OK, although it needs a copyedit and rectification of some MOS problems. See WP:MOSMUSIC.
- Release
- Looks fine, but needs a bit of expansion, copyedit, and MOS compliance.
- Critical reception
- It reads like an advertisement and needs less direct copy/pastes, more prose.
- See also
- Looks good.
- References
- Some of them need cleaning up with more information; publisher, consistent date formats, and the like.
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- In general, the article needs copyediting, less direct quotes, and compliance with WP:MOSMUSIC.
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- Is there any available information? About the development of the song, for instance?
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Critical reception section reads like a advertisement.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Non-free use rationales need immediate attention, and the captions are.... vague, at most.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- I'm afraid I have to fail this nomination. The article is a good start, but still has many issues that inhibit it from reaching GA. I suggest that you try to bring it up to B-class and have a peer review before another GA nomination, which I hope does succeed. Good luck. →Στc. 07:46, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail: