Talk:Croats of Vojvodina

Serbia Mid‑importance

	Serbia portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Serbia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Serbia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SerbiaWikipedia:WikiProject SerbiaTemplate:WikiProject SerbiaSerbia articles
Mid	This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Croatia

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Croatia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Croatia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CroatiaWikipedia:WikiProject CroatiaTemplate:WikiProject CroatiaCroatia articles

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Croats of Serbia#Croats in Vojvodina]] The anchor (Croats in Vojvodina) has been deleted.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

migrations[edit]

"at the end of the 19th century, a small number of Croats from Croatia migrated to the region". Does someone has more about this?
I'll wait for a week and then remove this line.
If eventually the source appears later, I'll restore this line. Kamarad Walter (talk) 16:44, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

merge[edit]

Oppose to merge. Also there areSerbs of Vojvodina and Serbs. Serbs of Dubrovnik and Serbs of Zagreb is not merged in Serbs of Croatia. Serbs of Mostar and Serbs of Sarajevo is not merged in Serbs of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Serbs of Kosovo is not merged in Serbs. Serbs of Hungary is not merged in Serbs of Hungary. Serbs of Toronto is not merged in Canadian Serbs. Romani people of Vojvodina and Roma in Serbia are separate articles. Montenegrins of Vojvodina and Montenegrins of Serbia are separate articles. Tnoucc (talk) 20:36, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

note that I merged two articles due to proposal of user:Joy. In my view, the merge was justified because most Serbian Croats are living in Vojvodina and because content of two articles was very similar. The existence of two separate articles for Croats in Serbia and Croats in Vojvodina would be justified if there is different content that could be placed in both articles. So, is there such content here or not? What would remain in the article Croats of Serbia if everything related to Vojvodina would be moved to Croats of Vojvodina? As for other articles which were presented here as examples, in my opinion, those articles where content is too similar should be merged as well, while those where is notable content difference should remain separate. PANONIAN 14:35, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

See Talk:Croats_of_Serbia#Merge.--Zoupan 18:36, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

project[edit]

~~What do Croats of Vojvodina have to do with project Republic of Croatia?~~

~~24.135.73.223 (talk) 12:04, 12 February 2013 (UTC)~~[reply]

The project isn't just for the republic, as you can see from its opening scope statement. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 14:38, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Croats of Vojvodina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110424122436/http://webrzs.stat.gov.rs/axd/en/popis.htm to http://webrzs.stat.gov.rs/axd/en/popis.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:57, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]