Talk:Crossing of the Andes

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Re/Merging proposal[edit]

I strongly oppose the proposed merging, on the basis that the Crossing of the Andes is of itself a major feat for both political history and military history. Furthermore, although the very Army of the Andes is obviously inseparable from that action, its history goes way beyond the crossing proper. Salut, --IANVS (talk) 13:56, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have left my opinions for opposing the merge as well at Talk:Army of the Andes. I suggest other users interested in it to talk there, not here, to avoid making duplicate threads MBelgrano (talk) 14:18, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wargaming[edit]

I really don't think a Wargaming society is a suitable reference. Uhlan talk 04:58, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wot, no map?[edit]

Why would we need a map when we don't even mention the actual territory?

David Lloyd-Jones (talk) 04:35, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Crossing of the Andes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:41, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]