Jump to content

Talk:Cry On/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: MsDusa (talk · contribs) 22:54, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Production

  • I figure it's implied that they were a new studio at the time given that it is past tense
  • Multiple types of control scheme > Multiple control schemes
  • "The evoking" > "The evocation"

Cancellation and legacy

  • You could stand to summarize the first quotation.

That's about it.

@MsDusa: Done. --ProtoDrake (talk) 20:31, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
pog - Whadup, it's ya girl, Dusa (talk) 20:32, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]