Talk:Culbertson 4-5 notrump

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Contract bridge, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Contract bridge on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Contract bridgeWikipedia:WikiProject Contract bridgeTemplate:WikiProject Contract bridgeContract bridge articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

If you want to try the 4-5[edit]

I recommend cutting it down to the king of the agreed suit - bidding theory has moved on since the 1930s. Culbertson 4-5 works very well with Italian-style non-committal cuebids below game. With slam in mind, you try to jockey the auction so that one partner or other can bid 4N - if they can't, 7 is out of the question, but 6 might still be on, and you have room to investigate. There's no "do you have the Q?" ask, but instead a "what do you feel about 6(7)?" ask. 4-5 is a seriously playable method. Narky Blert (talk) 00:52, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]