This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details.
I followed this storm and wasn't sure about the separate MH article when the storm was still active, but considering the amount of impacts, it makes sense to have one. Therefore, it would be nice if the met history could be condensed even more in the main article, down to two paragraphs ideally.
The first one should deal with (Briefly) the development, why it moved the way it did (neither the main article nor the MH sub-article mentions much of that), and briefly get up to its peak intensity. The second paragraph would then be the three landfalls and redevelopment. We don't need to mention ASCAT passes, and every status change, just an overall summary of the MH. I'll do it later if no one wants to tackle it. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:15, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Hurricanehink: Do you think it may be worth trying to get a completed interactive track to the met history article? There's quite a bit of point clustering on the normal track as is currently. I don't want to expend any further effort if it doesn't have any merit to it. NoahTalk 19:03, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ooh Hurricane Noah that would be great for the met history article! For the longest-lasting storm on record, it would be nice having that, particularly for any future GA or FA attempt. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:13, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
we need more images of the storm uploaded to properly make one. This includes all stages of its life. NoahTalk 23:54, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'm just wondering when will the official damages of cyclone freddy be on this Wikipedia page? It's taken a couple months and it's taking too long to find how much damage the storm caused. RonaldoIsTheGOAT1 (talk) 07:34, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]