Talk:Cyclone Lin

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleCyclone Lin was one of the good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 15, 2009Good article nomineeNot listed
August 15, 2009Good article nomineeListed
December 22, 2019Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Cyclone Lin (2009)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Just a quick note, I'm going to review this article but before I do, I would like the references to be fixed. Due to the recent error with webcite, most of the references in the article deadlink and since both the JTWC and RSMC Nadi archive their advisories so you should be able to get them. Cheers, Cyclonebiskit (talk) 01:14, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Cyclone Lin (2009)/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

I like this article for the most part, but I have a few "minor" fixes until I feel that it is upto GA standards.

  1. Over the next few days, the depression moved towards the southeast through the Fijian archipelago until late on April 3, when the Regional Specialized Meteorological Center in Nadi reported that the depression had intensified into a category one cyclone, and named it as Cyclone Lin whilst the JTWC did not start issuing warnings on Lin until the next day as it was approaching its 10-minute peak windspeeds of 110 km/h (65 mph) and 1-minute peak windspeeds of 95 km/h (60 mph). Is there anyway that you could break that up into multiple sentences?
DoneJason Rees (talk) 20:51, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Cyclone Lin then reached its peak windspeeds early on April 5 as it passed directly over Tonga and then later that day as it approached the edge of RSMC Nadi's area of responsibility Lin started to go through an extratropical transition with the JTWC issuing their last advisory on it. Same as above
DoneJason Rees (talk) 20:51, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Late on April 3, RSMC Nadi reported that the depression had intensified into a category one cyclone, on the Australian tropical cyclone intensity scale and named it as Lin whilst it was relocated to about 135 km (85 mi) to the south-west of Niuafo'ou. what was relocated?
DoneJason Rees (talk) 20:51, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

These are the few "minor" fixes that need to be done before being passed. --Anhamirak 20:22, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry got delayed by Advisory time disscussion.Jason Rees (talk) 20:51, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Passing --Anhamirak 21:02, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 22 external links on Cyclone Lin (2009). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:49, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merger[edit]

I wrote this article back in 2009 when I thought that all named tropical storms were worthy of an article. However, I no longer hold that opinion and after rewriting this article over the last few days, I now feel that there isnt any information out there that the season article cant hold. As a result, I am requesting a merger.Jason Rees (talk) 00:23, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Merge. A lot of the content was on warnings or minor damage. It looks like you got the important info, but make sure you didn't miss anything before we merge this. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 13:20, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge Not enough damage (including insinuated damage) and deaths to warrant an article. Storm didn't set any records, so I must also agree on merge at this time. NoahTalk 21:59, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merged and delisted as a GA.Jason Rees (talk) 17:05, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]