Jump to content

Talk:Cyclone Thane

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Proposed Thane image

[edit]

I wanted to discuss a image change here before I start some kind of edit war. The current image is the same as this one, but the proposed image is higher resolution, not cropped as close to the cyclone, has been altered to allow more details in the cloud structure, and is in .jpeg format. Let me know if the change would better suit the article. Supportstorm (talk) 21:19, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I changed it, good call. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 21:21, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I agree since you can see more of the pinhole eye in that image than the old one.Jason Rees (talk) 21:29, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

1-min sustained winds

[edit]

There had been some discrepancies on whether Thane is Category 1 or Category 2. According to NRL, its 1-min sustained winds are 150 km/h, thus making it a category 1. However according to JTWC its 1-min winds are 165 km/h, making it a category 2. So which dataset should we trust? JTWC or NRL? Damien4794 (talk) 03:35, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There should not be any discrepancies on the windspeeds since The NRL doesnt estimate windspeeds - they just host a copy of the JTWC's running best track. It is the JTWC that makes the warnings and the running best track before at the end of the season look over the data and revise their estimates in the cold light of day. As a result it is the 90 kts/165 km/h that we have to use for 1-minute sustained windspeeds.Jason Rees (talk) 14:32, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on Cyclone Thane. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:14, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 17 external links on Cyclone Thane. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:30, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]