Talk:Cypripedium reginae
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
pictures
[edit]I need more pictures of flowers.
Megachile
[edit]The under reproduction it mentions megachile bees and links to fr:megachile. It should be to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megachilidae instead. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.151.103.9 (talk) 17:50, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Cypripedium reginae. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040226210201/http://www.sos.state.mn.us/student/flower.html to http://www.sos.state.mn.us/student/flower.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051123094641/http://www.botany.wisc.edu/Orchids/reginae.html to http://www.botany.wisc.edu/Orchids/reginae.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110912073149/http://www.chembase.com/cbid_174864.htm to http://www.chembase.com/cbid_174864.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:00, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Conservation Status?
[edit]The conservation status is listed as "least concerned", however the article emphasizes the rarity of the flower. I don't know enough to know which one is true, but it should be cleared up. 2601:18F:4101:4830:312A:1469:A1D3:540C (talk) 23:39, 2 May 2020 (UTC)