Talk:Cyrus B. Comstock

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleCyrus B. Comstock has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 6, 2011Peer reviewReviewed
March 5, 2011Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Good article

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Cyrus B. Comstock/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:24, 4 March 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria[reply]

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
    Link US Military Academy, Army of the Tennessee
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
Thanks very much. I took care of those links. Let me know if there is anything else you think needs attention. Best, Historical Perspective (talk) 12:29, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]