Talk:DaVita

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Contested deletion[edit]

I do not see how this is promotional at all. Purely informative... Can you give me a specific reason for its removal? --TheWikiCreator7 (talk) 21:17, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings. There are actually two issues with this article. Firstly, it is unambiguously promotional - even if the only purpose is to "inform," well that's the same thing. Secondly, there is no indication of significance - in other words, why should Wikipedia have an article about this company? I suggest using the Article Creation wizard in future, and submitting your drafts for review. Exemplo347 (talk) 21:19, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Consider renaming to "DaVita"[edit]

The article for DaVita redirects to this page.

DaVita the company is a Fortune 500 company publically listed on the NYSE as DVA^[1]. DaVita Medical Group is a subsidary that was sold to UnitedHealth Group in 2017. I propose that DaVita be the subject of the article, and DaVita Medical Group should be a subsection within it.

Bravemidwesterner (talk) 00:49, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Other options:

1. Redirect DaVita to Davita Inc. (only) and use a hatnote to point to DaVita Medical Group.

2. Make DaVita a disambiguation page with links to both Davita Inc. and DaVita Medical Group

-- ℜob C. alias ALAROB 17:16, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ "DaVita". Fortune.

DaVita and Political Lobbying[edit]

It might be worth mentioning the role DaVita has played in lobbying California politics. In 2018, Prop 8 was opposed by DaVita and Fresenius who spent a combined $111 million to defeat a bill aimed at limiting companies profits off of dialysis at 15%. DaVita also pays the AKF to entice patients to sign up for their private insurance plan that charges ~4% more than medicare.

Pretty scammy and well documented on many sources.

https://www.modernhealthcare.com/legal/whistleblower-alleges-davita-fresenius-involved-kickback-scheme https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/05/opinion/california-ballot-initiatives-direct-democracy.html https://prospect.org/health/california-cracks-down-on-dialysis-profiteering/ Weuerle (talk) 06:40, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[1] "DaVita". Fortune.

[1]