Talk:Dacrydium cupressinum

New Zealand Mid‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Plants Mid‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

_{We need an image of a whole tree (also need a commons cat and to move the existing pics there). Richard001 11:27, 19 June 2007 (UTC)}[reply]

The best name for this page[edit]

There is a difference of opinion over the best name for this page, hence this note on the talk page to try to resolve it. Arguments for Rimu (tree) are that this is the English Wikipedia, and that as there is an English name for the tree, we should use it, and that this is the name by which this species is known worldwide (by people with varied interests, not just dendrologists). If there are reasons why scientific name should be chosen instead, please post them here. SP-KP 23:09, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

For consistency in page naming: all of the other Podocarpaceae are at scientific names (because most of them don't have English names at all). It makes nonsense of indexing in Category:Podocarpaceae to have one species listed out of order with the rest because it is indexed under its Maori name, rather than its scientific name. - MPF 10:55, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to go ahead and move it, according to Wikipedia:Naming conventions (fauna). The same should be done for the other trees in the family. Someoneinmyheadbutit'snotme 18:53, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fauna? But seriously, Rimu is most certainly the common name or 'English name'. It should be under Rimu_(tree) IMO. The overall convention ("if there is a common name, use that") should trump whatever has emerged with the other Podocarps. Certainly most of them in NZ have common names (Rimu, Totara, Kahikatea, Tanekaha, Matai etc..) Dougalc 08:40, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dacrydium cupressinum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120213134120/http://www.globaltwitcher.com/artspec_information.asp?thingid=95431 to http://www.globaltwitcher.com/artspec_information.asp?thingid=95431

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:49, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]