Talk:Dan Rosenfield

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

England Mid‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics of the United Kingdom B‑class High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
B	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group.

Does this page still qualify as a stub?

Wikipedia’s description of a stub article is quite ambiguous, defining one as “lacking the breadth of coverage expected from an encyclopedia”. I feel as if this article now has adequate information, however I thought that it would be best to develop a consensus before I removed the stub tag. DanJWilde (talk) 08:12, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edits on 30 January 2022 by myself and 213.205.198.156

I've added to the talk page in an effort to avoid edit warring. I do not believe the article as written by 213.205.198.156 was in line with Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons and Wikipedia:Good articles due to frankly trivial information being included as well as the page failing to strike a balance and failing to present negative articles conservatively as stipulated by Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons.

I would additionally remind 213.205.198.156 that Wikipedia's guidelines advise editors to assume good faith; I do not appreciate being accused of attempting to whitewash the page, especially not with personal interest. If it happens again I will seek guidance from Wikipedia's more senior editors as to what steps I can/should take to prevent it. Asrieltheoracle (talk) 09:37, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Photograph

Is there a more recent photo of him? The current one looks very out of date. 92.40.179.234 (talk) 13:29, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Searching 'Dan Rosenfield' on Wikimedia Commons doesn't herald any more results, unless you can figure anything else to search which may give one. Asrieltheoracle (talk) 13:12, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Link clarity

The article linked to should correspond as closely as possible to the term showing as the link, given the context. The reason for this is so that people understand what (or who) the link is pointing to. Everyone knows this person by the name under which they became nationally and internationally prominent in the period after 2003. See the discussions here and here. Cambial — foliar❧ 01:36, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop talking nonsense. We have very clear rules.HulkNorris (talk) 06:08, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your comment is unintelligible. Cambial — foliar❧ 12:57, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]