Jump to content

Talk:Daniel LeBlanc (settler)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Could you pls not remove this article/page. I am one of the 300,000 to 500,000 descendants of Daniel LeBlanc, and I appreciate having this article very much. Please don’t take it away. I am not a historian so I cannot validate or add to this article however, I do appreciate that it’s here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:56A:74BA:FC00:3CDC:E59:A7C6:812E (talk) 05:11, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[Untitled]

[edit]

I am a descendent of Daniel LeBlanc. I have a different birth date of 1621.....

His father - Rene LeBlanc, born 1575 in Martaize His Father - Alphonse LeBlanc, born 1550 in Martaize -> married to Isabeau D'Estrade (born Mar. 3, 1555 -> died July 15, 1582) His father - Pierre LeBlanc, born 1475 in Martaize.

Dates of birth for some LeBlanc descendants are incorrect in some sources. Why, I do not know. It seems that Catholic Church Records (they do not contradict what is known and well established) are about the best source for dates of latter descendants. It is believed by some that Pierre, born in 1475, was nobility. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.226.217.15 (talk) 01:57, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The link to the LeBlanc Family Newsletter should probably be removed. This link is provided by someone as "evidence" that Daniel LeBlanc was of Scottish Ancestry. Most, if not all, of the information in the newsletter is speculative and revolves around a hypothesis. This employee or associate gave a probability estimate to the author of the aforementioned newsletter of whether Daniel was a descendant of a Scotsman; yet, there are no credentials stated for the employee or associate of the DNA testing company for us to reason that the employee or associate was qualified to make such a statement. For these reasons, the newsletter lacks credibility to make it part of this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.69.213.93 (talk) 22:29, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]