Jump to content

Talk:Danielle Citron

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

due process

[edit]

We should refer to some of her works on Technological Due Process. Jim.henderson (talk) 15:46, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request to Add MacArthur Fellow

[edit]

Hello, I would like to propose the following be added to law professor Danielle Citron's article at the end of the first paragraph under Biography: Citron was awarded a 2019 MacArthur Fellowship for her work in cyber harrassment.[1]

JRobble (talk) 14:37, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ "Danielle Citron: Legal Scholar, Class of 2019". MacArthur Foundation. Retrieved 25 September 2019.

Reply 25-SEP-2019

[edit]

  Edit request implemented  

  • The requested claim was added.

plus Additional changes made:

  1. Claims which were unreferenced were omitted.
  2. Her house intelligence committee testimony was given a {{when}} template.
  3. Instances where the subject was referred to as "Professsor Citron" were removed per MOS:CREDENTIAL
  4. Accolades which did not demonstrate having their own Wikipedia article were omitted per WP:NPOV.[a][b]

Regards,  Spintendo  03:52, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notes

  1. ^ By their very nature, awards can be subjective — in that they represent a very specific point of view — the point of view of the individual or organization which determines who wins the award and why. To counter this, a good practice is to limit the listing of awards to only those which are independently notable in Wikipedia. This is not due to WP:N (which is not a content requirement), but rather, to ensure WP:NPOV. The adding of several points of view to an article in the form of awards mentioned may skew the article's balance.[1] Thus, my own practice is to limit the listing of awards to only those which are independently notable in Wikipedia.
  2. ^ By this same logic, the awarding of the MacArthur Fellowship (which has its own Wikipedia page) was approved and added to the article.

References

  1. ^ "WP:BALANCE". Wikipedia. 20 July 2019. ...articles should not give minority views or aspects as much of or as detailed a description as more widely held views or widely supported aspects.

Credit scoring

[edit]

What about her work with Frank Pasquale, The Scored Society?

What on earth

[edit]

What on earth is going on here? So many violations on this article starting with WP:NOTDIR and WP:PROMO. Good lord. Jtbobwaysf (talk) 10:23, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]