Talk:Danish rigsdaler
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Before and after?
[edit]It's quite clear what comes after the Danish Rigsdaler. But what came before? Also on the Danish Krone page, one of the links** references the Krone in 1619. Is this an earlier system to the 1625 one? A short-lived system?
- Meyers Großes Konversations-Lexikon, vol. 11. Leipzig 1907, p. 732 (online verfügbar); accessed Oktober 29, 2013
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Danish rigsdaler. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070929103102/http://www.globalfinancialdata.com/index.php3?action=showghoc&country_name=Denmark to http://www.globalfinancialdata.com/index.php3?action=showghoc&country_name=DENMARK
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:45, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
Background of the ₻ symbol?
[edit]This symbol appears elaborate, and the link ₻ redirects to this article, but this article does not explain the origin and development of the symbol at all, and Google has been of only limited help. I want to know more about this symbol. Can someone improve the article (preferably with references) to explain how the symbol ₻ came into being? - Gilgamesh (talk) 15:00, 19 October 2021 (UTC)