Talk:Dark Doodad Nebula

Can't be Sandqvist 149

The object Sandqvist 149 has already been identified as being located at 12h 34.4m −69° 45' in the original Sandqvist catalogue (see http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu//full/1977A%26A....57..467S/0000468.000.html?high=510ebc75ff05979).

I'm not denying that Steven R. Coe has identified the Dark Doodad as Sandqvist 149, but this identification makes no sense. Is there a way to reach him to inform it of that?

CielProfond (talk) 19:40, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dark Doodad Nebula. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120815184059/http://www.oneminuteastronomer.com/OMALibrary/dark-doodad.html to http://www.oneminuteastronomer.com/OMALibrary/dark-doodad.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:32, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Name dropping

What's with all the name-dropping and quoting in this article? It looks very unprofessional. Abductive (reasoning) 13:37, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

I've trimmed a couple of extraneous names, but the nebula's naming history I've left alone as it feels more important. — Huntster (t @ c) 19:35, 11 May 2018 (UTC)