Jump to content

Talk:Dartmouth Big Green football

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Team Color

[edit]

The official Dartmouth College color is Dartmouth Green. If the football team color automatically follows the college's color, then it is a mistake to identify green and white as the team colors in this article. The uniforms use black and white without those colors becoming official team colors. Unless the team has decided to make its official color differ from Dartmouth's, the article should be changed to list only green. --Greenmachinist (talk) 16:12, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Source? The 2010 media guide says otherwise: [1]. As does another Dartmouth athletic team, "Dartmouth Green and White": [2]. Strikehold (talk) 20:51, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The Wikipedia entry for Dartmouth correctly lists the school color as Dartmouth Green alone. John King Lord says green was adopted in 1866. "Ask Dartmouth" has a quote from a history of the color saying green was the only decent color not already taken by another school. A piece of the original green ribbon has a caption saying green was adopted in 1866. When you put a number on a uniform or put a stripe or border on an oar blade or a helmet it helps to use black or white or pink to make it stand out, and teams have always done this. Those two-tone combinations did not become the official school colors. They might be the official or semi-official colors of the individual teams however. If the football team really uses colors that are different from the official school color, that would be noteworthy and worth explaining in the article. --Greenmachinist (talk) 18:19, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I believe the media guide is mistaken, but it says what it says. The article should explain how and when the football team's colors came to differ from the school's color(s). --Greenmachinist (talk) 14:03, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Not without a reliable source, otherwise it is WP:SYNTH. As a side note, of the sources you provide, none specifically say that green is the only color that has ever been used. Why would a sports team have only one color anyway? You can look at their uniforms and helmets and see firsthand that they use two colors. Strikehold (talk) 19:34, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I agree we need to find a reliable source to explain this strange situation. I doubt that such a source exists, because I believe the media guide is mistaken regarding the officialness of the color white. It is a sort of tradition, along with black and lavender and other shades of green, but it can be changed and sometimes is changed from year to year. Was it two uniforms ago that Dartmouth used two different shades of green along with black? Why would a sports team have only one official color? Have you heard of the All Blacks, or the Dutch Oranje? Or the Harvard Crimson? Having one color doesn't prevent the team from using other colors for socks or pants, and they obviously must use a second color for numbers. You should read those old sources again since they all say green is the color. Not green and white. They needed to pick a color in 1866 and all the other good ones were taken (orange, crimson, blue, brown). The reason the sources do not say green is the "only" color is that it is obvious and implicit. No school needed two official colors until all the good single colors were chosen. That's one way to tell what the oldest schools are. So maybe calling white an "official" color instead of using it and discarding it from time to time is anti-elitist, a way of saying we're no different from the rest. --Greenmachinist (talk) 20:34, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dartmouth Big Green football. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:35, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]