Talk:Darwin (programming game)

Is this really a video game? Its certainly stretching the idea of "video game".

Its certainly a game, and it certainly relates to computers, but really its more of a programming excercise. No one refers to a programmer trying to solve programming puzzles for fun as "video games", after all. 192.211.30.243 (talk) 02:24, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

• No one refers to them as games, either. I think this counts as a video game, in the same way a text adventure game counts. -- Zalethon (Talk) 00:00, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

A text adventure game is interactive, at least. In Darwin, the players write their programs and submit them, and then do nothing until the results are in. There's no sensible "screen shot" to be provided for the classic implementation, though if a remake is done, it's possible that it could display a map showing ownership of regions, as seems to have been done for Core War. Joule36e5 (talk) 01:59, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

Citation is needed all throughout this article.... -- Zalethon (Talk) 00:00, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Darwin (programming game). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050809073458/http://vx.netlux.org/lib/mdm00.html to http://vx.netlux.org/lib/mdm00.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:39, 5 September 2017 (UTC)