Jump to content

Talk:Daughter of Emperor Xiaoming of Northern Wei

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineeDaughter of Emperor Xiaoming of Northern Wei was a History good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Did You KnowOn this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 18, 2013Good article nomineeNot listed
December 25, 2013Guild of Copy EditorsCopyedited
March 18, 2014Good article nomineeNot listed
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on December 4, 2013, and December 4, 2013.
The text of the entries was:
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on April 1, 2015, April 1, 2018, and February 12, 2019.
Current status: Former good article nominee

Untitled

[edit]

This looks suspiciously like an April Fools joke. Blue Eagle 21063 (talk) 13:13, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lame joke to begin with, not trans friendly

[edit]

Seriously, wikipedia? Even on April Fools day, using "crossdressing" as a joke is pretty insensitive to trans men and women. 12.11.127.253 (talk) 13:31, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is an April Fool, it does not say much for the wit and wisdom of Wikipedia's editors. Assuming it's not an April Fool, then we seem to be stooping to the lowest depths of the gutter, tabloid press to attract readers. It takes a huge leap of the imagination to link a tiny infant used for political reasons with crossdressing - or does someone imagine that Chinese babies were wrapped in blue or pink swaddling clothes and then themselves chose which to wear? Giano (talk) 16:29, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Somebody needs to work on having a sense of humor. Good grief! Terry Thorgaard (talk) 18:08, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unless I've missed something, the article doesn't actually support the claim that the unnamed female child was dressed in the clothing of the opposite sex. It says that the child was falsely claimed to be male - which is something else entirely. If the article can't support the claim of 'crossdressing', we shouldn't be stating it on the main page, regardless of whether it is transphobic or not. AndyTheGrump (talk) 19:24, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Controversy section

[edit]

"She was also an impostor for the throne as a boy." I think this sentence needs to be re-written. First, a 50-day old infant can't be an imposter, which generally requires intent. and "imposter for the throne" just doesn't seem right, linguistically. Terry Thorgaard (talk) 18:12, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Daughter of Emperor Xiaoming of Northern Wei. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:27, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]