This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Michigan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Michigan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MichiganWikipedia:WikiProject MichiganTemplate:WikiProject MichiganMichigan articles
This content is not supported by the source provided.CFredkin (talk) 07:48, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Arrant nonsense. If you look through the list, you can find a series of petroleum corporations; Murphy Oil on page 13, for instance. All of these are in North America; but if you wish to strike the North America bit, that is fine with me. The "petroleum" rather than "energy" is certainly supported by the source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.97.32.186 (talk) 08:41, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The source for this statement is page 49 of the document cited. There is no reference to "petroleum" there.CFredkin (talk) 16:10, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
A more tendentious editor I have not seen! If that is the case, then remove the bloody page number! 59.97.32.13 (talk) 12:28, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
In any case, no it is not; the source is the entire document, as per the references. Where the hell are you getting "page 49" from? 59.97.32.13 (talk) 12:30, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Page 49 (of 49) is where the section on partnerships resides in the source. There is no reference to "petroleum" in that section. The statement in this bio should not reference "petroleum" if it is not supported by the corresponding section in the source. Potentially contentious material that is unsourced can and should be removed immediately from a WP:BLP. Please stop restoring this content unless/until you can provide appropriate sourcing.CFredkin (talk) 17:26, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
