Talk:David Darst
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Neutrality
[edit]What will make this neutral? Bad news? --HZNLincoln (talk) 16:36, 10 November 2021 (UTC) To David Darst,
N\Cor R1, R2 R2, R3 R1, R3 1990 -1999 0.04 0.61 -1.9 2000-2006 0.65 0.24 - 0.37 1990-2006 0.17 0.43 - 0.4 Trend Increased 94% Decreased -154% Increased 49%
Table created: Jing Li Source: The Art of Asset Allocation N: number of years in average returns Cor: correlation coefficient R1: the commodity Research Bureau Total Return Index R2: CPI-U inflation R3 Citigroup U.S. Treasury – Bill 90-Day Index Trend: stability and predictability of correlation coefficient
Between 1990-2006, the correlation coefficient R1, R3, and R1, R2 had been upward trend, whereas the correlation coefficient of R2 and R3 had been a downward trend. As a result, the U.S. domestic monetary policy, including the federal open-market operations in NYC would be affected by the trend for the purpose of maintaining a smooth economic growth rate of GDP and a moderate inflation rate.
The table is for interview. So it is simple with my calculation on paper draft. Thank you.
reader, Jing Li — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.88.88.200 (talk) 19:55, 12 September 2024 (UTC)