Talk:Dawndraco
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Synonym?
[edit]Seems this genus was shot down by a multi-authored paper[1], but do we then also merge Geosternbergia into Pteranodon, or do we merge Dawndraco into Geosternbergia?
- I think we should merge Dawndraco into Geosternbergia, and leave the latter be for now. They are definitely two distinct species whether or not they are considered the same genus, so it couldn't hurt to have a separate article. Dinoguy2 (talk) 11:42, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- I agree... It seemed kind of inevitable from the start this would happen... FunkMonk (talk) 11:52, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- It seems the images can be used under CC By 4.0?--MWAK (talk) 06:40, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
- Yup, paper is open access and CC licensed! Dinoguy2 (talk) 11:18, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
- I added a photo of the specimen to the Geosternbergia article. Time to redirect this one? FunkMonk (talk) 22:29, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
- Yup, paper is open access and CC licensed! Dinoguy2 (talk) 11:18, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
- It seems the images can be used under CC By 4.0?--MWAK (talk) 06:40, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class amphibian and reptile articles
- Low-importance amphibian and reptile articles
- Start-Class amphibian and reptile articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles articles
- Start-Class Palaeontology articles
- Low-importance Palaeontology articles
- Start-Class Palaeontology articles of Low-importance
- Start-Class Pterosaurs articles
- Low-importance Pterosaurs articles
- Pterosaurs task force articles
- WikiProject Palaeontology articles