Jump to content

Talk:De Arte Gladiatoria Dimicandi

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merge

[edit]

I'd be happy to hear the reasoning of who put the merge tag up. It would seem reasonable, considering there is little known about Filippo Vadi, and all that is known comes from his book. However, if you look at a comparable situation such as Fiore dei Liberi and his book Flos Duellatorum, there is a short article on the man and a much longer article on the manuscript. The way it is right now, there probably isn't much room for expansion on Vadi himself, but plenty left to do on his book. So as of now, I would be against a merger, simply to allow for a seperation that would leave plenty of room to expand on the manuscript. Joshdboz 11:06, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]


I must agree with Joshdboz, i believe it would be wise to merge these two articles, that really belonged together in the first place.--Agamemnon Ebenezer Halel 00:53, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]


In the absence of further comment, I will complete the proposed merge. Jlittlet 17:20, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

To review:
I'm not sure, but I think the merge may have been made in error, assuming the text recorded here is the full discussion. I agree with Joshbodz that an article on Vadi could certainly stand on its own, as could an article on his chief work(s). Xiliquiern 20:08, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]


A couple of short items from this entry have been removed. First, the reference to Vadi's footwork being 'linear and like the modern sport' is gone. The orginal editor provided absolutely no evidence for the claim Vadi's footwork was anything like (presumably) modern sport fencing - a dubious and highly subjective claim given the bulk of Vadi's book describes fighting with the two-handed sword in earnest. Second, the reference to Vadi being translated into English 'recently' is gone - Vadi has been available in English translation (both published and online) for several years now. HEMA Gaukler (talk) 09:32, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on De Arte Gladiatoria Dimicandi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:58, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]