Talk:De Iniusta Vexacione Willelmi Episcopi Primi/GA1
GA Review[edit]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Nikkimaria (talk) 03:52, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
Hello! I will be reviewing this article for GA status. My review should be posted within the next few days. Cheers, Nikkimaria (talk) 03:52, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
- I've decided to promote this article to GA status. Cheers, Nikkimaria (talk) 15:02, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
Writing and formatting[edit]
- Headings: "The trial" -> "Trial"
- "The work consists of three sections, a central section that details the trial itself, and an introduction and conclusion" - are those the three sections, or are there three sections in addition to those? If the former, replace the first comma with a colon
- "Probably it was composed" -> "It was probably composed"
Accuracy and verifiability[edit]
- "it was first printed in 1655" - text and infobox both give a date range
- Why is "Anglo-Norman Durham" italicized in Citations but not in Sources?
- Be consistent in using "Woodbridge" vs "Woodbridge, UK"
Broad[edit]
No issues noted
Neutrality[edit]
No issues noted
Stability[edit]
No issues noted
Images[edit]
Image is PD and appropriately captioned